<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02444cam a2200325 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">991012465159704336</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250616105803.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">151027s2016    enk      b    001 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2015034951</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9780745696461</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(CaACU)4228664-01ucalg_inst</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(OCoLC)40026119268</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(OCoLC)931476266</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">(OCoLC)920017271</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DLC</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DLC</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">YDX</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">BDX</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">BTCTA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">CDX</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">NhCcYME</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">pcc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="050" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">LB1028.3</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">.S388857 2016</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Selwyn, Neil,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">25420</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Is technology good for education? </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">/ Neil Selwyn.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Cambridge, UK :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Malden, MA :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Polity Press,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2016.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">x, 178 pages ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">20 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Digital Technology and Educational Change &#x2014;
Making Education More Democratic? &#x2014;
Making Education More Personalized? &#x2014;
Making Education More Calculable? &#x2014;
Making Education More Commercial? &#x2014;
Education "Good" and the Digital &#x2013; So What Needs To Change?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Digital technologies are a key feature of contemporary education. Schools, colleges and universities operate along high-tech lines, while alternate forms of online education have emerged to challenge the dominance of traditional institutions. According to many experts, the rapid digitization of education over the past ten years has undoubtedly been a &#x2018;good thing&#x2019;.

Is Technology Good For Education? offers a critical counterpoint to this received wisdom, challenging some of the central ways in which digital technology is presumed to be positively affecting education. Instead Neil Selwyn considers what is being lost as digital technologies become ever more integral to education provision and engagement. Crucially, he questions the values, agendas and interests that stand to gain most from the rise of digital education.

This concise, up-to-the-minute analysis concludes by considering alternate approaches that might be capable of rescuing and perhaps revitalizing the ideals of public education, while not denying the possibilities of digital technology altogether.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Education</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Effect of technological innovations on</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">10125</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Educational technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Evaluation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Computer-assisted instruction</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Evaluation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Education, Higher</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Aims and objectives</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">24618</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">TBS</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">TBS</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-06-13</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">LB1028.3 SEL</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">B07553</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-06-13</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-06-13</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">4734</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">4734</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
