<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01901nam a22003017a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260512131120.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250918b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1552-7824</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0092-0703</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">tbs</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">English</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Beverland, Michael</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">23761</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Reconciling the tension between consistency and relevance: </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Design thinking as a mechanism for brand ambidexterity. </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">/ Beverland, M. B., Wilner, S. J., &amp; Micheli, P.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">589-609 pages</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In order to sustain and grow brand equity, brand managers are faced with balancing the preservation of existing brand identity through consistency with the need to maintain relevance, which requires change and innovation. In this paper we build upon the concept of organizational ambidexterity (March 1991), arguing that design thinking&#x2014;the logics and practices associated with designers&#x2014;can serve as a mechanism which promotes and enables the integration of brand consistency and relevance. Drawing on cases of innovation at firms across a range of industries, we show how design thinking can trigger brand ambidexterity across a three-stage process. We identify eight practices and examine how designers enable brand managers to address enduring consistency-relevance tensions in ways that ensure innovations renew or revitalize the brand without undermining its essence.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Branding (Marketing)</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">6284</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Business strategy</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">10467</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Cognitivism</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">25919</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Business innovation</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22624</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Organizational theory</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">2686</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Creativity</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">922</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Wilner, Sarah J. S. </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">25920</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Micheli, Pietro</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">25921</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://link-springer-com.hub.tbs-education.fr/article/10.1007/s11747-015-0443-8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">TBS</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">TBS</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-09-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-09-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://link-springer-com.hub.tbs-education.fr/article/10.1007/s11747-015-0443-8</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-09-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">18</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">4964</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">4964</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
