<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Reconciling the tension between consistency and relevance</title>
    <subTitle>Design thinking as a mechanism for brand ambidexterity</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Beverland, Michael</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Wilner, Sarah J. S.</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Micheli, Pietro</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <publisher>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2015</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">Eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">lis</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">h</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>589-609 pages</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>In order to sustain and grow brand equity, brand managers are faced with balancing the preservation of existing brand identity through consistency with the need to maintain relevance, which requires change and innovation. In this paper we build upon the concept of organizational ambidexterity (March 1991), arguing that design thinking—the logics and practices associated with designers—can serve as a mechanism which promotes and enables the integration of brand consistency and relevance. Drawing on cases of innovation at firms across a range of industries, we show how design thinking can trigger brand ambidexterity across a three-stage process. We identify eight practices and examine how designers enable brand managers to address enduring consistency-relevance tensions in ways that ensure innovations renew or revitalize the brand without undermining its essence.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">/ Beverland, M. B., Wilner, S. J., &amp; Micheli, P.</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Branding (Marketing)</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Business strategy</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Cognitivism</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Business innovation</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Organizational theory</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Creativity</topic>
  </subject>
  <identifier type="isbn">1552-7824</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn">0092-0703</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">https://link-springer-com.hub.tbs-education.fr/article/10.1007/s11747-015-0443-8</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://link-springer-com.hub.tbs-education.fr/article/10.1007/s11747-015-0443-8</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg"/>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">250918</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260512131120.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
