01750nam a22003017a 4500003000400000005001700004008004100021022001400062040001700076041001200093100003700105245004500142260003400187362007100221520067500292650001900967653003000986653002601016653002201042653002101064653002101085653001901106653001701125856010401142942000801246952017901254999001501433OSt20251103115237.0250910b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d a0017-8012 aEnglishctbs aEnglish aPorter, Michael E.d1947-923689 aWhat Is Strategy? c/ Michael E. Porter  bHarvard Business Reviewc1996 aHarvard Business Review. Nov-Dec, 1996, Vol. 74 Issue 6, p61, 18 p aFor nearly two decades, managers have followed new rules: be flexible, benchmark constantly, outsource efficiently, and focus on core strengths. Traditional positioning has been dismissed as too static, with the belief that any advantage is short-lived. Yet these are dangerous half-truths. While globalisation and agility matter, much of today’s so-called hypercompetition is self-inflicted. The real problem is confusing operational effectiveness with strategy. Tools like benchmarking or reengineering improve performance but don’t create lasting advantage. As managers chase improvement on every front, they risk losing clear, sustainable competitive positions. 0aStrategy91208 aOperational Effectiveness aCompetitive Advantage aCore Competencies aHypercompetition aManagement Tools aSustainability aBenchmarking uhttps://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/edsgao/_b64_ZWRzZ2NsLjE4ODk2OTY0/what-is-strategy 2lcc 00102lcc4070aTBSbTBSd2025-11-03l0r2025-11-03uhttps://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/edsgao/_b64_ZWRzZ2NsLjE4ODk2OTY0/what-is-strategyw2025-11-03yARTICLE c5129d5129