<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01653nam a22002777a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20251103160810.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250910b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0167-8116</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">English</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">tbs</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">English</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Geuens, Maggie</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">3457</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A new measure of brand personality</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">/ Maggie Geuens, Bert Weijters,  Kristof De Wulf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">International Journal of Research in Marketing</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="362" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">International Journal of Research in Marketing. Volume 26, Issue 2, June 2009, Pages 97-107</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In response to criticism of brand personality measures that embrace other aspects besides brand personality, we developed a new brand personality measure consisting of personality items only. Belgian respondents (n = 12,789) participated in a study of 193 brands. The new scale consists of five factors that show an affinity with the Big Five human personality dimensions. Unlike existing scales, this new measure proved to be reliable for between-brand between-category comparisons, for between-brand within-category comparisons, and for between-respondent comparisons. Moreover, the scale showed high test&#x2013;retest reliability and cross-cultural validity (in the US and nine other European countries).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Brand personality</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Brand attitude</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Scale development</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Scale reliability</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Scale validity</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Weijters, Bert</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">26401</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">De Wulf, Kristof</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">26402</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/edselp/S0167811609000172/a-new-measure-of-brand-personality</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">TBS</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">TBS</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-11-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-11-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/edselp/S0167811609000172/a-new-measure-of-brand-personality</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-11-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICLE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">5134</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">5134</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
