<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01591nam a22002417a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260512153916.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">251023b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0149-2063</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">English</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">tbs</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">English</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bundy, Jonathan</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">26439</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Comparative lobbying research</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">: advances, shortcomings and recommendations</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">/ Diren&#xE7; Kanol</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">Journal of Public Affairs</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="362" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Journal of Public Affairs Volume 15 Number 1 pp 110&#x2013;115 (2015) - DOI: 10.1002/pa.1527</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This review article suggests that there is a new school of comparative lobbying emerging. However, this development is taking place only gradually. Unlike the earlier studies, which studied corporatism/pluralism, outside lobbying and lobbying regulations, the new comparativists are mainly focusing on inside lobbying strategies and success as a function of country-level factors. Yet, the literature still suffers from underdeveloped theories. I stress that our knowledge can be improved with better theorizing. Better theories, in turn, can be formulated by improving the use of quantitative data gathering, qualitative research, formal models and better communication between researchers working with different methodologies in different disciplines.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Comparative Lobbying</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lobbying</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Advocacy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Interest Groups</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/bth/100766302/comparative-lobbying-research-advances-shortcomings-and-recommendations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">TBS</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">TBS</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-11-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-11-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/bth/100766302/comparative-lobbying-research-advances-shortcomings-and-recommendations</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-11-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICLE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">5152</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">5152</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
