01819nam a22002537a 4500003000400000005001700004008004100021022001400062040001700076041001200093100002700105245009800132260003600230362009200266520075800358653002501116653001301141653001301154653002001167856014001187942000801327952021501335999001501550OSt20260512153916.0251023b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  a0149-2063  aEnglishctbs  aEnglish  aBundy, Jonathan926439  aComparative lobbying researchb: advances, shortcomings and recommendationsc/ Direnç Kanol  bJournal of Public Affairsc2015  aJournal of Public Affairs Volume 15 Number 1 pp 110–115 (2015) - DOI: 10.1002/pa.1527  aThis review article suggests that there is a new school of comparative lobbying emerging. However, this development is taking place only gradually. Unlike the earlier studies, which studied corporatism/pluralism, outside lobbying and lobbying regulations, the new comparativists are mainly focusing on inside lobbying strategies and success as a function of country-level factors. Yet, the literature still suffers from underdeveloped theories. I stress that our knowledge can be improved with better theorizing. Better theories, in turn, can be formulated by improving the use of quantitative data gathering, qualitative research, formal models and better communication between researchers working with different methodologies in different disciplines.  aComparative Lobbying  aLobbying  aAdvocacy  aInterest Groups  uhttps://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/bth/100766302/comparative-lobbying-research-advances-shortcomings-and-recommendations  2lcc  00102lcc4070aTBSbTBSd2025-11-05l0r2025-11-05uhttps://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/bth/100766302/comparative-lobbying-research-advances-shortcomings-and-recommendationsw2025-11-05yARTICLE  c5152d5152