01825nam a22002897a 4500003000400000005001700004008004100021022001400062022001400076040001700090041000800107100003300115245008400148260005600232300001700288362008500305520070200390630003801092650003101130650002901161650002401190700004701214856008301261942000801344952016801352999001501520OSt20260515115939.0260121b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  a1460-8545  a1468-2370  aTBSbENcTBS  aeng  aPeng, Mike W.922139eauthor  aCurrent debates in global strategyc/ Mike W. Peng, Erin G. Pleggenkuhle-Miles.  bInternational Journal of Management Reviews,c2009.  a51-68 pages.  aInternational journal of management reviews : IJMR, 2009-03, Vol.11 (1), p.51-68  aDebates help drive research forward. This paper is unique in its review of four current debates in the global strategy arena: (1) cultural vs institutional distance; (2) global vs regional geographic diversification; (3) convergence vs divergence in corporate governance; and (4) domestic vs overseas corporate social responsibility. For each debate, the history is tracked and the emerging tension highlighted. By introducing both sides of four lively and timely debates, the paper provides an innovative way of reviewing the literature and helping to advance the field. It is argued that an underlying theme connecting these four diverse debates is the institution-based view of global strategy. 0aMSc International Business926977 0aCorporate governance97297 0aStrategic planning93573 0aGlobalization92394  aPleggenkuhle-Miles, Erin G.927004eauthor  uhttps://research-ebsco-com.hub.tbs-education.fr/c/q5dvh4/viewer/pdf/lhbvjlytpf  2lcc  00102lcc40708CTaTBSbTBSd2026-05-13l0p5235r2026-05-13uhttps://research-ebsco-com.hub.tbs-education.fr/c/q5dvh4/viewer/pdf/lhbvjlytpfw2026-05-13yARTICLE  c5235d5235