000			02137nam a22002777a 4500
003			OSt
005			20260512153907.0
008			251023b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a0149-2063
040			_aEnglish _ctbs
041			_aEnglish
100			_aBundy, Jonathan _926439
245			_aCrises and Crisis Management _b: Integration, Interpretation, and Research Development _c/ Jonathan Bundy, Michael D. Pfarrer, Cole E. Short and W. Timothy Coombs
260			_bJournal of Management _c2016
362			_aJournal of Management Vol. XX No. X, Month XXXX 1 –32 DOI: 10.1177/0149206316680030
520			_aOrganizational research has long been interested in crises and crisis management. Whether focused on crisis antecedents, outcomes, or managing a crisis, research has revealed a number of important findings. However, research in this space remains fragmented, making it difficult for scholars to understand the literature’s core conclusions, recognize unsolved problems, and navigate paths forward. To address these issues, we propose an integrative framework of crises and crisis management that draws from research in strategy, organizational theory, and organizational behavior as well as from research in public relations and corporate communication. We identify two primary perspectives in the literature, one focused on the internal dynamics of a crisis and one focused on managing external stakeholders. We review core concepts from each perspective and highlight the commonalities that exist between them. Finally, we use our integrative framework to propose future research directions for scholars interested in crises and crisis management.
653			_aCrisis management
653			_aOrganizational research
653			_aIndustrial organization (Economic theory)
653			_aCorporate communications
700			_aPfarrer, Michael D. _926440
700			_aShort, Cole E. _926441
700			_aCoombs, W. Timothy _95987
856			_uhttps://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/bth/123471041/crises-and-crisis-management-integration-interpretation-and-research-development
942			_2lcc
999			_c5151 _d5151