000			01591nam a22002417a 4500
003			OSt
005			20260512153916.0
008			251023b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a0149-2063
040			_aEnglish _ctbs
041			_aEnglish
100			_aBundy, Jonathan _926439
245			_aComparative lobbying research _b: advances, shortcomings and recommendations _c/ Direnç Kanol
260			_bJournal of Public Affairs _c2015
362			_aJournal of Public Affairs Volume 15 Number 1 pp 110–115 (2015) - DOI: 10.1002/pa.1527
520			_aThis review article suggests that there is a new school of comparative lobbying emerging. However, this development is taking place only gradually. Unlike the earlier studies, which studied corporatism/pluralism, outside lobbying and lobbying regulations, the new comparativists are mainly focusing on inside lobbying strategies and success as a function of country-level factors. Yet, the literature still suffers from underdeveloped theories. I stress that our knowledge can be improved with better theorizing. Better theories, in turn, can be formulated by improving the use of quantitative data gathering, qualitative research, formal models and better communication between researchers working with different methodologies in different disciplines.
653			_aComparative Lobbying
653			_aLobbying
653			_aAdvocacy
653			_aInterest Groups
856			_uhttps://bibliotheque.tbs-education.fr/Default/doc/bth/100766302/comparative-lobbying-research-advances-shortcomings-and-recommendations
942			_2lcc
999			_c5152 _d5152