| 000 | 01645nam a22002777a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20260515115939.0 | ||
| 008 | 260121b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a1460-8545 | ||
| 022 | _a1468-2370 | ||
| 040 |
_aTBS _bEN _cTBS |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 |
_aPeng, Mike W. _922139 _eauthor |
||
| 245 |
_aCurrent debates in global strategy _c/ Mike W. Peng, Erin G. Pleggenkuhle-Miles. |
||
| 260 |
_bInternational Journal of Management Reviews, _c2009. |
||
| 300 | _a51-68 pages. | ||
| 362 | _aInternational journal of management reviews : IJMR, 2009-03, Vol.11 (1), p.51-68 | ||
| 520 | _aDebates help drive research forward. This paper is unique in its review of four current debates in the global strategy arena: (1) cultural vs institutional distance; (2) global vs regional geographic diversification; (3) convergence vs divergence in corporate governance; and (4) domestic vs overseas corporate social responsibility. For each debate, the history is tracked and the emerging tension highlighted. By introducing both sides of four lively and timely debates, the paper provides an innovative way of reviewing the literature and helping to advance the field. It is argued that an underlying theme connecting these four diverse debates is the institution-based view of global strategy. | ||
| 630 | 0 |
_aMSc International Business _926977 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCorporate governance _97297 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aStrategic planning _93573 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aGlobalization _92394 |
|
| 700 |
_aPleggenkuhle-Miles, Erin G. _927004 _eauthor |
||
| 856 | _uhttps://research-ebsco-com.hub.tbs-education.fr/c/q5dvh4/viewer/pdf/lhbvjlytpf | ||
| 942 | _2lcc | ||
| 999 |
_c5235 _d5235 |
||